I am not in a position to compare these three programs, but if you're seriously considering Photo Supreme it may be worth tracking down some of those who made the switch and asking why.Īs a general comment, I would say that if you're serious about managing your images then a dedicated DAM is going to be better than the database component of a raw converter. Of course if you buy a 3.6 license you get access to the beta.Ī while back in the IMatch 5 beta test there was a big influx of disgruntled IdImager users, when that program was suddenly discontinued without warning and Photo Supreme was introduced. If you're not in a hurry it would be worth waiting a little to see if it goes into public release soon. It relies on open standards so no lock-in. It integrates very well with an Adobe workflow, but can accommodate others as well. But I have seen the program and I think this is one case when those statements are true. I hesitate to say this, because with every program there's always a new version coming that will do everything you want and it's always just about to release. My impression is that it's getting very close to final. To properly assess IMatch you need to look at version 5, the beta of which has been used for some time by anyone with a license to version 3.6. IMatch 3.6 is by now very dated and a little quirky by today's standards, but still very functional. I'm jumping in just to make two observations. I can't give you any comparative comments as I've only really used IMatch and have done so for a very long time. What have you tried? Any comments about the software above? any thoughts about any of this? I am sure there are many ways of doing this but what is efficient, simple, etc. Daminion this looks interesting, sever based, have not tried it yet but will probably try out the free version Photo Supreme by Idmager, This looks real promising and I am going to do the trial.Ĥ. Media Pro from Phase One, the creators of Capture One. I used to use this before Lightroom, kind of quirky but not familiar with current release, Easy to do scripts.Ģ. Here are some of the asset management programs I have seen or used, with some notes if I have used it:ġ. I could then select an editor and have it track the changes and revisions and let me keep a centralized catalog between a laptop and desktop. Ideally what I would like to have a catalog sitting on a network drive and then I can add images to the database and it would manage them. So the point of this thread was to discuss and bring up other asset management solutions that will work with the multiple raw conversions. Also if I choose not to do the subscription, then what are my options. Since I also use Photoninja I have been wondering and looking for other programs that might do the job of cataloging and managing the catalogs but still let me choose the raw conversion. I have not really liked the Capture One cataloging, although it does work. Who knows when or if that is going to happen. What has got me thinking and looking for alternatives is that at some point, Adobe will take Lightroom to a subscription level only. I have been using Lightroom to do the cataloging, or asset management. I also have Capture One and really like it a lot, and that is one I do most of my conversions in lately, I also have Photoninja which does a great job also. I am not here to debate raw conversions as I have several that I use and I have not decided on a particular one for 100% of the usage. As we all know the raw conversions of the x-series is not as optimal as it could be, some like it, some don't. I have been using Lightroom since it came out and I have been pretty happy with the program, especially for the DAM or cataloging.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |