Your account on and can be used to check the delivery Recognized proof of both mailing and delivery.Ĭertified mail piece is created using a unique tracking number assignedīy the United States Postal Service (USPS). Number to each article mailed and provides the sender with a legally REQUIRED: I hereby certify that Marketing Mail submitted by me qualifies underĭMM 243.2.0 criteria and I accept liability for any and all charges assessed by USPS for non-conformance, as well as all incurred production costs and all costs for reprinting my mailpieces should I choose to resubmit my mail at First-Class rates.Īn “extra” domestic mail service that assigns a unique tracking Reliable service standards are not available for Marketing Mail, please plan accordingly. For more information on USPS mailing standards, please refer to theĭelivery Expectations - USPS delivery times for Marketing Mail are unavoidably inconsistent and can range from 3 to 30 days. ![]() ![]() USPS inspects system-wide for content violations and ineligible materials are subject to additional charges and penalties. These materials are specifically defined inĭMM Section 133.3. Nonprofit rate mail is Marketing Mail.Ĭertain materials such as bills, purchase agreements and statements of account Content is restricted as defined in theĭomestic Mail Manual (DMM) 243.2.0. Personal information may not be included in a USPS Marketing Mail mailpiece. Add that point to your response to any objection that opposing counsel might raise.To qualify for lower postage rates Marketing Mail (formerly Standard Mail) must conform to strict USPS criteria. The party against whom the evidence is admitted is free to attack its credibility or weight with all the concerns about reliability that often are directed against admissibility (see Rule 104(e)). I think evidence discovered by entering a tracking number in USPS's website is very much in your favor as far as credibility, even to the level of judicial notice. ![]() Remember, too, that Rules 902(5) and 803(8) deal with threshold admissibility, not the weight afforded by the fact finder. Blackmore Sewer Construction, Inc., 298 F.3d 600, 607 (7th Cir. San Francisco Newspaper Agency, 2002 WL 31119944 (admitting a printout from the "'Track & Confirm' page at the USPS website" because the "USPS qualifies as a public agency" and the "delivery confirmation is a record of the activity that the USPS carries out-namely the delivery of mail")) and second, that you are taking judicial notice of information from an official website (see Laborers' Pension Fund v. You could go with the "two-punch" Illinois Rules of Evidence 902(5) and 803(8): First, that it is a self-authenticating public record (see Chapman v. You can argue the tracking information is admissible as a public record under Illinois Rule of Evidence 803(8). If personal delivery was required, then that is what should have been ordered through a private process server. I really find it hard to believe that the judge would need an affidavit from USPS. I would think that an affidavit from the person who prepared the package and placed it for mailing and obtained the tracking number and delivery confirmation would suffice-along with an additional statement that it was not returned to the sender. Send out a corporate representative subpoena for an evidence deposition and follow the rules found at 39 C.F.R. That being said, I think you offered the missing piece of the puzzle: Show the judge the tracking code, which will also make the other counsel look like an obstructionist.īryan Sims, Naperville. Often, though not always, when you explain to the recipient of an information request how a subpoena works, they remember how to be flexible. Does anyone know how to get the USPS to provide a self-authenticating document showing mailing dates for certified mail? However, USPS says its policy is never to sign these. We have already asked the USPS, via a subpoena, to sign a simple-form affidavit that would self-authenticate the document under Illinois Rule of Evidence 902(11). However, the defendant disputes the USPS's tracking information and is forcing us to prove the mailing date by other means. We have the tracking number and can show, from the USPS website, the dates it was sent and received. We need to prove that a letter sent via certified U.S. ![]() (From ISBA Central's Litigation community) How do you prove the date a certified letter was mailed when opposing counsel disputes information obtained from the letter's tracking number and the United States Postal Service refuses to sign an affidavit?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |